LEADERSHIP PREP OCEAN HILL CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

58

14%

LEVEL 3

144

34%

LEVEL 4

194

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

166

39%

LEVEL 4

149

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

108

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

87

39%

LEVEL 4

87

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

86

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

62

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

282
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

48

13%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

161

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

252
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

133

39%

LEVEL 4

119

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

28

54%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

29

44%

LEVEL 4

25

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

49

13%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

185

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

156

40%

LEVEL 4

144

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

308
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

92

22%

LEVEL 3

162

38%

LEVEL 4

146

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

29

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

35

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

296
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

51

14%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

165

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

259
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

82

23%

LEVEL 3

145

40%

LEVEL 4

114

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

309
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

49

13%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

181

47%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

13

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.