BROWNSVILLE ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

404
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

109

17%

LEVEL 2

140

21%

LEVEL 3

202

31%

LEVEL 4

202

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

471
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

83

12%

LEVEL 2

121

18%

LEVEL 3

210

31%

LEVEL 4

261

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

71

21%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

117

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

253
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

56

16%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

137

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

183
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

85

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

218
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

65

20%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

124

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

352
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

96

17%

LEVEL 2

118

21%

LEVEL 3

175

31%

LEVEL 4

177

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

400
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

74

13%

LEVEL 2

106

18%

LEVEL 3

173

30%

LEVEL 4

227

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

22

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

31

41%

LEVEL 4

26

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

121

21%

LEVEL 3

188

33%

LEVEL 4

191

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

435
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

96

17%

LEVEL 3

185

33%

LEVEL 4

250

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

43

49%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

75

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

54

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

279
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

88

19%

LEVEL 2

108

23%

LEVEL 3

152

32%

LEVEL 4

127

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

390
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

74

13%

LEVEL 2

106

19%

LEVEL 3

183

32%

LEVEL 4

207

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

383
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

106

17%

LEVEL 2

139

22%

LEVEL 3

192

31%

LEVEL 4

191

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.