HEBREW LANGUAGE ACADEMY CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

94

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

95

23%

LEVEL 3

99

24%

LEVEL 4

99

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

48

25%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

49

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

56

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

50

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

87

36%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

83

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

78

24%

LEVEL 2

73

22%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

25

43%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

34

45%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

183
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

86

24%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

91

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

190
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

92

24%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

98

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

40

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

41

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

189
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.