ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

138

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

136

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

68

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

57

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

70

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

79

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

102
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

57

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

98
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

61

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

77

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

114
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

71

51%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

130

45%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

128

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

19

50%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

215
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

131

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

206
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

46

18%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

133

51%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

15

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

123

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

132

49%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

215
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

129

44%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.