SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

96

22%

LEVEL 2

138

32%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

92

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

84

20%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

107

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

59

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

31

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

65
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

32

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

127
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

65

22%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

143
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

69

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

88

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

102

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

35

49%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

177
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

90

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

204
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

105

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

35

43%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

32

47%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

83

21%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

99

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

81

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

190
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

95

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.