Skip to Content
Main content

CRESTON ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

172

38%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

159

36%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

78

36%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

101
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

154

40%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

146
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

141

37%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

51

60%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

53

65%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

102

63%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

86

61%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

161

39%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

69

17%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

150

35%

LEVEL 2

112

26%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

129

37%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

126

35%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

43

45%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.