Skip to Content
Main content

PELHAM ACAD-ACADEMICS AND COMMUNITY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

99

34%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

110

34%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

63

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

35

27%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

32

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

60

37%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

50

31%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

23

51%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

77

39%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

63

26%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

53

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

36

68%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

42

64%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

28

61%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.