Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCHOOL OF INQUIRY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

199

71%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

17

6%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

197

71%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

92

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

106

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

107

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

91

72%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

50

86%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

52

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

129

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

123

68%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

10

71%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

10

83%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

4%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

197

72%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

192

72%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

260
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

195

71%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

251
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

195

72%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

162

70%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

160

74%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

37

73%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

37

60%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.