Skip to Content
Main content

BEDFORD STUY NEW BEGINNINGS CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

180

42%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

95

21%

LEVEL 2

108

24%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

149

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

98

42%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

82

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

67

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

109

47%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

116
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

122
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

79

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

119

36%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

129

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

61

67%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

44

44%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

20

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

129
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

151

40%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

76

20%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

229
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

144

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

18

43%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

15

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

172

43%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

90

22%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

134

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

119
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

152

42%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

28

45%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.