RIVERTON STREET CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

126

23%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

164

30%

LEVEL 4

111

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

108

19%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

153

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

91

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

250
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

126

26%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

101

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

285
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

93

18%

LEVEL 2

146

28%

LEVEL 3

145

28%

LEVEL 4

140

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

117

25%

LEVEL 3

154

33%

LEVEL 4

107

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

145

29%

LEVEL 3

142

28%

LEVEL 4

148

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

43

55%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

41

55%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

305
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

107

19%

LEVEL 2

159

28%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

153

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

27

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

57

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

112

25%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

135

31%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

96

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

269
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

122

23%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

159

30%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.