BUSHWICK ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

78

15%

LEVEL 2

102

20%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

191

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

380
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

80

15%

LEVEL 3

171

33%

LEVEL 4

209

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

93

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

192
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

109

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

60

22%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

98

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

188
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

100

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

83%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

68
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

33

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

261
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

63

17%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

154

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

296
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

45

12%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

167

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

46

11%

LEVEL 2

76

18%

LEVEL 3

128

30%

LEVEL 4

177

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

340
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

50

12%

LEVEL 3

150

36%

LEVEL 4

190

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

32

35%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

35

33%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

309
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

91

19%

LEVEL 3

128

27%

LEVEL 4

181

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

348
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

70

15%

LEVEL 3

150

32%

LEVEL 4

198

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

32
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

11

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

38

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

26

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

83

20%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

153

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

347
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

56

12%

LEVEL 2

77

16%

LEVEL 3

164

34%

LEVEL 4

183

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

317
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

94

19%

LEVEL 3

139

29%

LEVEL 4

178

37%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.