Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 5 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

320

76%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

428
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

44

10%

LEVEL 4

384

90%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

219
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

170

77%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

197

89%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

150

75%

MALE

PROFICIENT

207
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

187

90%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

9

90%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

8

89%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

283
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

222

76%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

287
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

253

88%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

83

78%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

114
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

105

91%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

279

85%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

337

92%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

83
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

42

46%

LEVEL 4

41

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

62
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

47

75%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

402
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

314

76%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

413
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

373

90%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

6

86%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

11

73%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

43

80%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

59

95%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

357
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

3%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

277

75%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

366
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

325

89%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

374
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

3%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

295

77%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

25

69%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.