NEW WORLD PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

102

25%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

52

55%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

53

50%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

168
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

28

61%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

32

53%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

97

28%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

93

26%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.