BROOKLYN DREAMS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

130

31%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

79

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

132

36%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

72

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

59

34%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

66

31%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

22

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

16

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

104

40%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

24

28%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

19

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

13

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

90

30%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

42

60%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

42

64%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

174
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

108

27%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

143
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

118

35%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

118

32%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

68

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

114

37%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

173
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.