ACAD-PERSONAL LDSHP AND EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

306

59%

LEVEL 2

162

31%

LEVEL 3

43

8%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

317

58%

LEVEL 2

140

26%

LEVEL 3

62

11%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

129

56%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

148

57%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

177

61%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

169

60%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

29

60%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

29

59%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

272

60%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

282

60%

LEVEL 2

120

25%

LEVEL 3

53

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

230

57%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

37

9%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

218

53%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

76

66%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

99

76%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

153

46%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

181

49%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

153

81%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

136

78%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

298

60%

LEVEL 2

152

31%

LEVEL 3

38

8%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

298

59%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

56

11%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

241

56%

LEVEL 2

140

32%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

265

59%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

51

11%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

65

72%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

52

55%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.