SCHOOL FOR FUTURE LEADERS (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

135

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

144

71%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

66

63%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

64

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

69

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

80

71%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

153
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

123

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

130

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

129

66%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

9

5%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

134

74%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

115

74%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

137
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

119

82%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

32
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

19

29%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

20

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

25

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

8

80%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

7

88%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

127

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

137

71%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

113

61%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

22

65%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.