ACE ACADEMY FOR SCHOLARS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

40

18%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

98

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

36

14%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

118

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

50

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

64

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

48

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

54

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

36

78%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

34

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

31

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

18

24%

LEVEL 4

41

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

26

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

34

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

94

47%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

117

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

98

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

118

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

48

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

63

71%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

50

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

55

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

94

44%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

35

14%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

118

49%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.