HELEN M MARSHALL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

149

41%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

74

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

134

42%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

72

42%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

63

39%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

77

41%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

71

44%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

41

89%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

26

84%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

146

49%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

129

47%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

73

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

82

32%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

55

77%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

52

75%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

109
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

87

82%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

73

78%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

13

68%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

10

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

145

42%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

130

42%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

107
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

103

37%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

66

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

99

39%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

46

55%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

35

53%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.