ACHIEVEMENT FIRST ASPIRE CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

101

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

69

19%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

135

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

55

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

78

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

46

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

68

40%

LEVEL 4

57

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

156
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

78

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

210
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

103

36%

LEVEL 4

107

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

18

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

23

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

92

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

121

38%

LEVEL 4

127

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

193
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

100

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

269
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

66

18%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

134

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

26

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

29

36%

LEVEL 4

35

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

76

35%

LEVEL 4

75

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

106

37%

LEVEL 4

100

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

185
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

90

35%

LEVEL 4

95

37%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.