Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-UPPER WEST GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

36

9%

LEVEL 4

358

87%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

445
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

38

8%

LEVEL 4

407

89%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

176

87%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

218
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

198

89%

MALE

PROFICIENT

198
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

182

87%

MALE

PROFICIENT

227
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

209

90%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

53

96%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

132

96%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

120

99%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

66
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

52

68%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

58

72%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

142
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

125

84%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

176
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

158

88%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

17

5%

LEVEL 4

298

94%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

351

98%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

79
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

60

62%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

88
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

56

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

390
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

14

3%

LEVEL 3

36

9%

LEVEL 4

354

87%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

209

95%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

224

95%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

149

77%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

183

84%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

375
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

341

87%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

17

85%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.