SILAS WOOD 6TH GRADE CENTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

25

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

23

28%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

27

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

27

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

26

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

23

36%

LEVEL 4

26

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

41

40%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

34

40%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

19

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

53

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

16

80%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

107
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

50

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

105
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

54

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

29

83%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

17

89%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

37

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

36

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

51

44%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.