TEACHERS COLLEGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

49

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

18

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

22

21%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

32

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

12

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

18

72%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

19

32%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

17

25%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

30

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

47

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

23

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

37

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

47

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.