Skip to Content
Main content

BAYCHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

167

57%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

157

57%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

63

51%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

61

48%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

104

60%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

96

64%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

110

54%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

96

56%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

47

63%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

52

61%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

114

49%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

112

50%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

53

88%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

45

83%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

34
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

157

55%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

142

55%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

15

88%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

26

60%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

141

56%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

135

56%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

149

56%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

132

55%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.