COMMUNITY VOICES MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

169

60%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

186

55%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

86

64%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

88

55%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

83

56%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

98

55%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

137

58%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

149

53%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

23

74%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

97

48%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

109

43%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

72

91%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

77

90%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

148

57%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

54
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

169

54%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

21

95%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

17

65%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

40

56%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

39

48%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

129

61%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

147

57%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

140

59%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

147

55%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

29

67%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

39

54%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.