NEIGHBORHOOD CHARTER SCHOOL OF HARLE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

106

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

50

15%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

152

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

49

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

82

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

57

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

70

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

63

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

121
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

80

48%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

37

39%

LEVEL 4

38

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

60

40%

LEVEL 4

65

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

86

50%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

23

10%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

118

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

20

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

61
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

34

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

106

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

248
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

148

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

22

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

34

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

84

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

118

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

163
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

92

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

14

56%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.