Skip to Content
Main content

ICAHN CHARTER SCHOOL 7 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

49

38%

LEVEL 4

40

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

82

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

22

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

47

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

26

43%

LEVEL 4

18

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

35

47%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

24

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

64
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

38

48%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

21

41%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

28

37%

LEVEL 4

34

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

40

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

13

9%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

80

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

80

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

14

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

19

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

39

41%

LEVEL 4

26

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

63

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

84
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

40

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

5

83%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.