Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL QUEENS ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

162

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

80

19%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

166

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

78

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

94

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

84

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

72

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

48

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

45

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

19

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

20

45%

LEVEL 4

15

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

162
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

88

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

182
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

97

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

159

44%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

65

17%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

160

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

264
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

75

21%

LEVEL 3

103

29%

LEVEL 4

161

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

290
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

60

16%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

166

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

20

53%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

26

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

35

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

136

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

72

20%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

131

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

259
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

157

41%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.