Skip to Content
Main content

CANARSIE ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

135

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

358
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

81

17%

LEVEL 3

148

30%

LEVEL 4

210

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

74

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

113

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

61

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

34

15%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

97

42%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

221
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

127

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

332
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

76

17%

LEVEL 3

140

31%

LEVEL 4

192

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

15

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

122

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

61

14%

LEVEL 3

131

31%

LEVEL 4

198

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

358
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

78

16%

LEVEL 3

148

31%

LEVEL 4

210

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

50

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

57

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

85

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

153

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

233
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

130

41%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.