MOUNT EDEN CHILDREN'S ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

22

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

34

36%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

19

20%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

60

39%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

63

35%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

84
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.