WAVE PREPARATORY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

31

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

44

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

44

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

23

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

18

19%

LEVEL 2

24

25%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

36

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

38

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

49

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

58

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

80

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

17

36%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

57

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

85

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

19
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

79

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

47

21%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

75

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.