Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACAD CS-PROSPECT HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

215

81%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

304

87%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

133

85%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

181

89%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

82

75%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

123

84%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

203
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

164

78%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

234
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

203

86%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

37

86%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

71

87%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

202

88%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

265

90%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

17

47%

LEVEL 4

13

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

53
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

39

72%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

51

81%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

104

93%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

164

81%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

200

84%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

244
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

201

80%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

14

93%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.