Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-UNION SQUARE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

262

88%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

423
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

4

1%

LEVEL 3

36

8%

LEVEL 4

387

90%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

127

88%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

197

90%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

135

89%

MALE

PROFICIENT

208
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

190

91%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

6

86%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

76

90%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

105

95%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

48

79%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

92
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

82

88%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

69

83%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

126
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

107

82%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

219

96%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

16

5%

LEVEL 4

328

95%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

66
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

43

62%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

79
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

59

71%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

419
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

1%

LEVEL 3

35

8%

LEVEL 4

384

91%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

157

91%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

222

95%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

105

84%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

165

85%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

279
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

250

89%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

12

80%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.