UNITY PREP CHARTER SCH OF BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

123

45%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

107

44%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

51

39%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

49

42%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

72

51%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

58

46%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

96

45%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

86

44%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

68

37%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

44

70%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

39

68%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

113

44%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

86

44%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

105

45%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.