GREAT OAKS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

128

52%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

29

31%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

54

50%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

43

38%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

74

54%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

8

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

25

47%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

47

63%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

74

50%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

72

42%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

37

60%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

56

78%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

121

51%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

26

39%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

102

57%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.