NEW AMERICAN ACAD-R CLEMENTE STATE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

204

64%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

173

57%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

92

63%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

78

56%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

112

65%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

95

59%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

74

64%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

67

66%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

121

63%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

101

54%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

130

58%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

100

47%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

74

78%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

73

81%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

151

60%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

127

53%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

53

80%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

46

74%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

188

63%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

171

59%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

169

64%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

144

59%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

35

63%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.