HIGHBRIDGE GREEN SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

189

56%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

173

52%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

94

54%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

84

49%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

95

58%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

89

54%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

44

56%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

142

56%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

136

53%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

127

49%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

62

78%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

69

80%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

126

49%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

114

45%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

63

79%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

59

73%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

185

56%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

168

52%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

160

56%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

153

53%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

29

56%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

21

45%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.