VISTA ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

154

36%

LEVEL 2

127

30%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

143

31%

LEVEL 2

151

33%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

82

41%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

84

36%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

13

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

42

41%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

39

39%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

102

37%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

82

22%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

62

78%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

61

66%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

121

32%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

33

70%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

36

64%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

153

37%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

139

31%

LEVEL 2

146

33%

LEVEL 3

98

22%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

130
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

130

35%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

110

28%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

24

43%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.