Skip to Content
Main content

HAWTREE CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

146

47%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

101

32%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

69

46%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

77

48%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

67

63%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

31

49%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

28

45%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

102

40%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

44

73%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

36

51%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

70
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

133

45%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

108
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

132

47%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

135

45%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

100

32%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.