JACK ABRAMS STEM MAGNET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

142

37%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

85

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

46

41%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

44

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

80

35%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

48

40%

LEVEL 4

46

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

54

38%

LEVEL 4

57

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

58

54%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

103

59%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

37

88%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

136
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

67

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

64

21%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

85

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

37

82%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

67

88%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

52

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

71

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

74

54%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

122

60%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

137

36%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

85

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.