Skip to Content
Main content

CORNING-PAINTED POST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

214

37%

LEVEL 2

140

24%

LEVEL 3

136

24%

LEVEL 4

82

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

282

38%

LEVEL 2

197

27%

LEVEL 3

188

26%

LEVEL 4

70

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

80

33%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

124

37%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

134

40%

LEVEL 2

72

22%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

158

39%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

9

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

190

38%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

120

24%

LEVEL 4

66

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

245

38%

LEVEL 2

176

27%

LEVEL 3

165

26%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

124

27%

LEVEL 2

133

28%

LEVEL 3

130

28%

LEVEL 4

80

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

170

28%

LEVEL 2

181

30%

LEVEL 3

180

30%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

90

86%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

112

82%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

254
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

282

39%

LEVEL 2

194

27%

LEVEL 3

185

25%

LEVEL 4

69

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

70

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

104

25%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

132

55%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

178

55%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

256
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

276

38%

LEVEL 2

196

27%

LEVEL 3

186

26%

LEVEL 4

70

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.