Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ACA GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

86

35%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

52

35%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

97
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

87

31%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

25

74%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

27

68%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

99

41%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

74

25%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

67

35%

LEVEL 2

80

42%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

84

35%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.