ATMOSPHERE ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

150

37%

LEVEL 2

157

39%

LEVEL 3

75

18%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

95

24%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

78

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

77

38%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

73

36%

LEVEL 2

88

44%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

29

40%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

117

37%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

152
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

94

30%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

56

60%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

46

57%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

117

33%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

186
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

75

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

33

66%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

22

49%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

139

38%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

105

28%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

128

35%

LEVEL 2

142

39%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.