ONEIDA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

367

73%

LEVEL 2

89

18%

LEVEL 3

33

7%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

314

64%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

45

9%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

168

75%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

145

63%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

199

72%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

169

65%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

56

69%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

42

48%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

79

62%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

66

57%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

127

78%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

97

70%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

88

80%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

92

75%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

263

68%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

221

57%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

104

91%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

93

88%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

344

72%

LEVEL 2

88

18%

LEVEL 3

32

7%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

289

63%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

44

10%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

23

92%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

38

52%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

44

40%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

329

77%

LEVEL 2

74

17%

LEVEL 3

20

5%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

270

70%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

352

73%

LEVEL 2

88

18%

LEVEL 3

33

7%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

308

64%

LEVEL 2

117

24%

LEVEL 3

44

9%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

15

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.