COMPARING GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

WILLIAMSON CSD

2019

WAYNE COUNTY

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

138

36%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,751
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,452

LEVEL 1

1,953

36%

LEVEL 2

1,748

32%

LEVEL 3

1,256

23%

LEVEL 4

495

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,007
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,629

LEVEL 1

801

30%

LEVEL 2

821

31%

LEVEL 3

690

26%

LEVEL 4

317

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

744
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,823

LEVEL 1

1,152

41%

LEVEL 2

927

33%

LEVEL 3

566

20%

LEVEL 4

178

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

72

37%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,547
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,519

LEVEL 1

1,502

33%

LEVEL 2

1,470

33%

LEVEL 3

1,098

24%

LEVEL 4

449

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

136

61%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

238

49%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,715
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,686

LEVEL 1

1,389

30%

LEVEL 2

1,582

34%

LEVEL 3

1,222

26%

LEVEL 4

493

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

43

74%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 766

LEVEL 1

564

74%

LEVEL 2

166

22%

LEVEL 3

34

4%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

88

23%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,746
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,375

LEVEL 1

1,900

35%

LEVEL 2

1,729

32%

LEVEL 3

1,251

23%

LEVEL 4

495

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

53

69%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

71

37%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,131
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,545

LEVEL 1

606

24%

LEVEL 2

808

32%

LEVEL 3

765

30%

LEVEL 4

366

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

620
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,907

LEVEL 1

1,347

46%

LEVEL 2

940

32%

LEVEL 3

491

17%

LEVEL 4

129

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

89

23%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1,748
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,424

LEVEL 1

1,939

36%

LEVEL 2

1,737

32%

LEVEL 3

1,254

23%

LEVEL 4

494

9%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

153
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

1,747
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,442

LEVEL 1

1,951

36%

LEVEL 2

1,744

32%

LEVEL 3

1,252

23%

LEVEL 4

495

9%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

154
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

134

35%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1,743
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,367

LEVEL 1

1,901

35%

LEVEL 2

1,723

32%

LEVEL 3

1,250

23%

LEVEL 4

493

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

52

61%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.