COMPARING GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

LYNCOURT UFSD

2016

ONONDAGA COUNTY

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

62

38%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,352
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,031

LEVEL 1

9,101

38%

LEVEL 2

7,578

32%

LEVEL 3

5,336

22%

LEVEL 4

2,016

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

31

39%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,178
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,608

LEVEL 1

3,730

32%

LEVEL 2

3,700

32%

LEVEL 3

2,903

25%

LEVEL 4

1,275

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

31

38%

LEVEL 2

35

43%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,174
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,423

LEVEL 1

5,371

43%

LEVEL 2

3,878

31%

LEVEL 3

2,433

20%

LEVEL 4

741

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

210
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 921

LEVEL 1

399

43%

LEVEL 2

312

34%

LEVEL 3

161

17%

LEVEL 4

49

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

109

55%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

487
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,260

LEVEL 1

448

36%

LEVEL 2

325

26%

LEVEL 3

299

24%

LEVEL 4

188

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

28

25%

LEVEL 2

49

44%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5,903
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,925

LEVEL 1

3,819

26%

LEVEL 2

5,203

35%

LEVEL 3

4,265

29%

LEVEL 4

1,638

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

471
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,049

LEVEL 1

3,358

67%

LEVEL 2

1,220

24%

LEVEL 3

384

8%

LEVEL 4

87

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

255
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,676

LEVEL 1

968

58%

LEVEL 2

453

27%

LEVEL 3

207

12%

LEVEL 4

48

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

39

29%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,236
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,638

LEVEL 1

6,310

31%

LEVEL 2

7,092

34%

LEVEL 3

5,233

25%

LEVEL 4

2,003

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

23

88%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

116
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,393

LEVEL 1

2,791

82%

LEVEL 2

486

14%

LEVEL 3

103

3%

LEVEL 4

13

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7,335
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,743

LEVEL 1

7,983

35%

LEVEL 2

7,425

33%

LEVEL 3

5,320

23%

LEVEL 4

2,015

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,288

LEVEL 1

1,118

87%

LEVEL 2

153

12%

LEVEL 3

16

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,752
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,583

LEVEL 1

2,498

20%

LEVEL 2

4,333

34%

LEVEL 3

4,015

32%

LEVEL 4

1,737

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

51

50%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,600
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,448

LEVEL 1

6,603

58%

LEVEL 2

3,245

28%

LEVEL 3

1,321

12%

LEVEL 4

279

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

7,352
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,980

LEVEL 1

9,056

38%

LEVEL 2

7,572

32%

LEVEL 3

5,336

22%

LEVEL 4

2,016

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

45

88%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.