COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

JEAN NUZZI INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

2019

QUEENS COUNTY

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,122

LEVEL 1

453

40%

LEVEL 2

310

28%

LEVEL 3

215

19%

LEVEL 4

144

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61,881
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 120,089

LEVEL 1

29,165

24%

LEVEL 2

29,043

24%

LEVEL 3

28,403

24%

LEVEL 4

33,478

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

199
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

217

38%

LEVEL 2

151

27%

LEVEL 3

114

20%

LEVEL 4

85

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30,432
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 58,202

LEVEL 1

13,360

23%

LEVEL 2

14,410

25%

LEVEL 3

14,111

24%

LEVEL 4

16,321

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

236

43%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

101

18%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31,449
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 61,887

LEVEL 1

15,805

26%

LEVEL 2

14,633

24%

LEVEL 3

14,292

23%

LEVEL 4

17,157

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

783
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,179

LEVEL 1

181

15%

LEVEL 2

215

18%

LEVEL 3

267

23%

LEVEL 4

516

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

21
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

30

47%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1,031
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,218

LEVEL 1

627

28%

LEVEL 2

560

25%

LEVEL 3

556

25%

LEVEL 4

475

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

169
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25,945
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,913

LEVEL 1

3,336

10%

LEVEL 2

5,632

16%

LEVEL 3

8,660

25%

LEVEL 4

17,285

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,477
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,731

LEVEL 1

2,195

15%

LEVEL 2

3,059

21%

LEVEL 3

4,172

28%

LEVEL 4

5,305

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

211

48%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6,524
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,828

LEVEL 1

7,643

39%

LEVEL 2

5,661

29%

LEVEL 3

3,924

20%

LEVEL 4

2,600

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

94

45%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18,121
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,220

LEVEL 1

15,183

32%

LEVEL 2

13,916

29%

LEVEL 3

10,824

23%

LEVEL 4

7,297

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 955

LEVEL 1

319

33%

LEVEL 2

282

30%

LEVEL 3

210

22%

LEVEL 4

144

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57,424
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 98,151

LEVEL 1

17,289

18%

LEVEL 2

23,438

24%

LEVEL 3

25,388

26%

LEVEL 4

32,036

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

134

80%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4,457
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,938

LEVEL 1

11,876

54%

LEVEL 2

5,605

26%

LEVEL 3

3,015

14%

LEVEL 4

1,442

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

354
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,040

LEVEL 1

395

38%

LEVEL 2

291

28%

LEVEL 3

210

20%

LEVEL 4

144

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58,121
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 102,735

LEVEL 1

20,336

20%

LEVEL 2

24,278

24%

LEVEL 3

25,858

25%

LEVEL 4

32,263

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

58

71%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3,760
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,354

LEVEL 1

8,829

51%

LEVEL 2

4,765

27%

LEVEL 3

2,545

15%

LEVEL 4

1,215

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

135

37%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,251
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,242

LEVEL 1

5,357

16%

LEVEL 2

6,634

20%

LEVEL 3

8,297

25%

LEVEL 4

12,954

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

318

42%

LEVEL 2

202

27%

LEVEL 3

144

19%

LEVEL 4

95

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40,630
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 86,847

LEVEL 1

23,808

27%

LEVEL 2

22,409

26%

LEVEL 3

20,106

23%

LEVEL 4

20,524

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

350
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,058

LEVEL 1

419

40%

LEVEL 2

289

27%

LEVEL 3

208

20%

LEVEL 4

142

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59,179
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 111,958

LEVEL 1

25,916

23%

LEVEL 2

26,863

24%

LEVEL 3

26,901

24%

LEVEL 4

32,278

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

34

53%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2,702
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,131

LEVEL 1

3,249

40%

LEVEL 2

2,180

27%

LEVEL 3

1,502

18%

LEVEL 4

1,200

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.