COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

2015

MONROE COUNTY

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

715
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,639

LEVEL 1

6,868

71%

LEVEL 2

2,056

21%

LEVEL 3

550

6%

LEVEL 4

165

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,653
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,371

LEVEL 1

10,610

35%

LEVEL 2

8,108

27%

LEVEL 3

6,478

21%

LEVEL 4

5,175

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

332
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,606

LEVEL 1

3,281

71%

LEVEL 2

993

22%

LEVEL 3

262

6%

LEVEL 4

70

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,705
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,754

LEVEL 1

5,007

34%

LEVEL 2

4,042

27%

LEVEL 3

3,279

22%

LEVEL 4

2,426

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

383
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,033

LEVEL 1

3,587

71%

LEVEL 2

1,063

21%

LEVEL 3

288

6%

LEVEL 4

95

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,948
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,617

LEVEL 1

5,603

36%

LEVEL 2

4,066

26%

LEVEL 3

3,199

20%

LEVEL 4

2,749

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

388
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

144

19%

LEVEL 2

236

31%

LEVEL 3

211

27%

LEVEL 4

177

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

21

41%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

246

59%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

51

12%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

855
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,582

LEVEL 1

371

23%

LEVEL 2

356

23%

LEVEL 3

398

25%

LEVEL 4

457

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

494

57%

LEVEL 2

207

24%

LEVEL 3

103

12%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,505
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,829

LEVEL 1

2,249

15%

LEVEL 2

4,075

27%

LEVEL 3

4,525

31%

LEVEL 4

3,980

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

303
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,609

LEVEL 1

4,131

74%

LEVEL 2

1,175

21%

LEVEL 3

248

4%

LEVEL 4

55

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,099
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,679

LEVEL 1

5,307

61%

LEVEL 2

2,273

26%

LEVEL 3

783

9%

LEVEL 4

316

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

179
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,712

LEVEL 1

1,974

73%

LEVEL 2

559

21%

LEVEL 3

145

5%

LEVEL 4

34

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

793
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,462

LEVEL 1

2,518

56%

LEVEL 2

1,151

26%

LEVEL 3

552

12%

LEVEL 4

241

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

678
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,791

LEVEL 1

5,195

67%

LEVEL 2

1,918

25%

LEVEL 3

520

7%

LEVEL 4

158

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,353
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,524

LEVEL 1

7,676

29%

LEVEL 2

7,495

28%

LEVEL 3

6,266

24%

LEVEL 4

5,087

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,848

LEVEL 1

1,673

91%

LEVEL 2

138

7%

LEVEL 3

30

2%

LEVEL 4

7

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

300
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,847

LEVEL 1

2,934

76%

LEVEL 2

613

16%

LEVEL 3

212

6%

LEVEL 4

88

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

686
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,112

LEVEL 1

5,561

69%

LEVEL 2

1,865

23%

LEVEL 3

526

6%

LEVEL 4

160

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11,505
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 28,306

LEVEL 1

9,063

32%

LEVEL 2

7,738

27%

LEVEL 3

6,377

23%

LEVEL 4

5,128

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

29
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,527

LEVEL 1

1,307

86%

LEVEL 2

191

13%

LEVEL 3

24

2%

LEVEL 4

5

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

148
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,065

LEVEL 1

1,547

75%

LEVEL 2

370

18%

LEVEL 3

101

5%

LEVEL 4

47

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

422

57%

LEVEL 2

180

24%

LEVEL 3

89

12%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8,704
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,329

LEVEL 1

1,867

13%

LEVEL 2

3,758

26%

LEVEL 3

4,450

31%

LEVEL 4

4,254

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

575
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,897

LEVEL 1

6,446

72%

LEVEL 2

1,876

21%

LEVEL 3

461

5%

LEVEL 4

114

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,949
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,042

LEVEL 1

8,743

55%

LEVEL 2

4,350

27%

LEVEL 3

2,028

13%

LEVEL 4

921

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

11,651
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,361

LEVEL 1

10,604

35%

LEVEL 2

8,106

27%

LEVEL 3

6,477

21%

LEVEL 4

5,174

17%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.