COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

CAZENOVIA MIDDLE SCHOOL

2019

MADISON COUNTY

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

72

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,381
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,058

LEVEL 1

792

26%

LEVEL 2

885

29%

LEVEL 3

843

28%

LEVEL 4

538

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

43

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

704
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,522

LEVEL 1

389

26%

LEVEL 2

429

28%

LEVEL 3

427

28%

LEVEL 4

277

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

677
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,536

LEVEL 1

403

26%

LEVEL 2

456

30%

LEVEL 3

416

27%

LEVEL 4

261

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

43
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

67

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,276
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,803

LEVEL 1

718

26%

LEVEL 2

809

29%

LEVEL 3

776

28%

LEVEL 4

500

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

72

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,340
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,590

LEVEL 1

463

18%

LEVEL 2

787

30%

LEVEL 3

807

31%

LEVEL 4

533

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

41
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

329

70%

LEVEL 2

98

21%

LEVEL 3

36

8%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,378
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,040

LEVEL 1

783

26%

LEVEL 2

879

29%

LEVEL 3

841

28%

LEVEL 4

537

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

65

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

943
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,657

LEVEL 1

257

16%

LEVEL 2

457

28%

LEVEL 3

532

32%

LEVEL 4

411

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

438
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,401

LEVEL 1

535

38%

LEVEL 2

428

31%

LEVEL 3

311

22%

LEVEL 4

127

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1,372
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,016

LEVEL 1

772

26%

LEVEL 2

872

29%

LEVEL 3

836

28%

LEVEL 4

536

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.