COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

TOWN OF WEBB UFSD

2015

HERKIMER COUNTY

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

39

38%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

614
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,910

LEVEL 1

589

31%

LEVEL 2

707

37%

LEVEL 3

440

23%

LEVEL 4

174

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

323
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 941

LEVEL 1

247

26%

LEVEL 2

371

39%

LEVEL 3

228

24%

LEVEL 4

95

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

291
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 969

LEVEL 1

342

35%

LEVEL 2

336

35%

LEVEL 3

212

22%

LEVEL 4

79

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

581
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,813

LEVEL 1

557

31%

LEVEL 2

675

37%

LEVEL 3

417

23%

LEVEL 4

164

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

36

42%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

602
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,610

LEVEL 1

350

22%

LEVEL 2

658

41%

LEVEL 3

429

27%

LEVEL 4

173

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

239

80%

LEVEL 2

49

16%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

612
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,897

LEVEL 1

582

31%

LEVEL 2

703

37%

LEVEL 3

438

23%

LEVEL 4

174

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

22

36%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

376
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 918

LEVEL 1

208

23%

LEVEL 2

334

36%

LEVEL 3

251

27%

LEVEL 4

125

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 992

LEVEL 1

381

38%

LEVEL 2

373

38%

LEVEL 3

189

19%

LEVEL 4

49

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top