COMPARING GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

GEORGE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL

2018

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

235

50%

LEVEL 2

124

26%

LEVEL 3

67

14%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,805
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,314

LEVEL 1

2,178

30%

LEVEL 2

2,331

32%

LEVEL 3

1,909

26%

LEVEL 4

896

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,567
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,477

LEVEL 1

812

23%

LEVEL 2

1,098

32%

LEVEL 3

1,024

29%

LEVEL 4

543

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

141

58%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,238
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,837

LEVEL 1

1,366

36%

LEVEL 2

1,233

32%

LEVEL 3

885

23%

LEVEL 4

353

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

116
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

144

37%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

30

50%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

16

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

96

39%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,406
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,544

LEVEL 1

1,362

25%

LEVEL 2

1,776

32%

LEVEL 3

1,597

29%

LEVEL 4

809

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

99

70%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

208
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,131

LEVEL 1

571

50%

LEVEL 2

352

31%

LEVEL 3

174

15%

LEVEL 4

34

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

178

44%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,729
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,276

LEVEL 1

1,486

24%

LEVEL 2

2,061

33%

LEVEL 3

1,842

29%

LEVEL 4

887

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

57

85%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

76
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,038

LEVEL 1

692

67%

LEVEL 2

270

26%

LEVEL 3

67

6%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2,795
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,061

LEVEL 1

1,980

28%

LEVEL 2

2,286

32%

LEVEL 3

1,900

27%

LEVEL 4

895

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

198

78%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,604
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,976

LEVEL 1

484

16%

LEVEL 2

888

30%

LEVEL 3

992

33%

LEVEL 4

612

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

209

59%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,201
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,338

LEVEL 1

1,694

39%

LEVEL 2

1,443

33%

LEVEL 3

917

21%

LEVEL 4

284

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,800
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,286

LEVEL 1

2,163

30%

LEVEL 2

2,323

32%

LEVEL 3

1,905

26%

LEVEL 4

895

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2,803
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,298

LEVEL 1

2,169

30%

LEVEL 2

2,326

32%

LEVEL 3

1,907

26%

LEVEL 4

896

12%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2,796
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,232

LEVEL 1

2,130

29%

LEVEL 2

2,306

32%

LEVEL 3

1,900

26%

LEVEL 4

896

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

48

59%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.